Open borders would likely boost cross-border trade

 If the India-Pakistan and India-Bangladesh borders were made fully open today, the most likely migration pattern would be a significant, multi-directional flow of people driven primarily by economic disparities, historical ties, and political/social stability, with the volume of movement across the India-Bangladesh border likely surpassing that of the India-Pakistan border. 

Key Migration Patterns

• India-Bangladesh Borders: The primary pattern would likely be a substantial, sustained migration from Bangladesh into India, predominantly for economic opportunities and due to environmental pressures in the low-lying delta regions of Bangladesh.
  • Economic Drivers: Migrants would primarily seek low-skilled and semi-skilled jobs in the informal sector, construction, and garment industries in Indian cities like Kolkata, Mumbai, and Delhi where there is high labor demand.
  • Reverse Migration (Skilled Labor): A smaller, but significant, number of skilled Indian professionals (e.g., in the textile, IT, and healthcare sectors) might migrate to Bangladesh for high-paying positions, a trend that already exists unofficially.
  • Medical and Educational Travel: An increase in short-term, legal movement from Bangladesh to India for medical treatment and education would also be expected, as these are current "pull" factors for Bangladeshis.
  • Social Networks: Migration would be heavily influenced by existing family and community networks on both sides of the border, which would facilitate the settlement process.
• India-Pakistan Borders: Migration across the India-Pakistan border would likely be less voluminous than the India-Bangladesh movement, and more influenced by the long history of political conflict, historical displacement, and religious factors.
  • Family Reunification: A major driver would be family reunification, as many families were split during the 1947 Partition and have ongoing ties.
  • Religious and Political Factors: Migration could be influenced by minority populations in both countries seeking refuge from perceived or actual religious or political discrimination.
  • Economic Migration: Some economic migration might occur, but existing political tensions and different economic structures might limit the scale compared to the India-Bangladesh border dynamics. 

Overall Implications

• Demographic Shifts: There would be significant, immediate demographic changes in India's border states (West Bengal, Assam, Tripura, Punjab, Rajasthan, Gujarat) as people move across the newly opened borders.
• Labor Market Dynamics: Both India and Bangladesh could experience shifts in their labor markets, with a potential increase in the supply of informal labor in Indian urban centers and a possible outflow of specific skilled workers from India to Bangladesh.
• Infrastructure Strain: Indian border cities and towns would likely face increased pressure on their infrastructure and social services, such as housing, sanitation, and healthcare.
• Regional Economic Integration: Open borders would likely boost informal and formal cross-border trade, increasing regional economic integration, a potentially positive long-term effect despite initial challenges. 

The immediate implementation of fully open borders would lead to a period of adjustment with complex socio-economic and political consequences for all three nations.

- GoogleAI 

https://www.google.com/search?q=what+kind+of+migration+pattern+is+likely+if+indo-pak+and+indo-Bangladesh+borders+are+made+open+today&oq

Inequality and exploitation are the only path to a moral society

 Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra

There is virtually no convergence between the core theories of Karl Marx and Ludwig von Mises; they represent fundamentally opposing economic and political paradigms. Mises was a staunch critic of Marx and a leading advocate for free-market capitalism, private property, and limited government, while Marx was the architect of the theory of class conflict that called for the abolition of capitalism and the establishment of a classless, communist society. 

Their disagreements spanned the fundamental aspects of economic theory: 

• Theory of Value: Marx adhered to a version of the labor theory of value, which held that a commodity's value is determined by the amount of labor embodied in it. Mises and the Austrian School, in contrast, championed the subjective theory of value, which posits that value is based on individual, subjective valuations and preferences.
• Economic Calculation: Mises famously argued that rational economic calculation is impossible under socialism because the absence of private property in the means of production eliminates market prices for capital goods, which are necessary signals for efficient resource allocation. Marx, by contrast, scoffed at the idea of creating "blueprints" for a future socialist society and devoted virtually no attention to its economic institutions, believing that a planned economy would naturally be more rational and efficient than the "anarchy" of the market.
• Class Conflict vs. Harmony: Marx viewed capitalism as a system inherently driven by class conflict between the bourgeoisie (owners) and the proletariat (workers). Mises, drawing on the subjective theory of value, saw capitalism as a system based on the harmony of interests of all participants, where individuals voluntarily cooperate through the division of labor.
• Role of the State: Marx envisioned the state eventually withering away in a communist society, but saw a strong, potentially coercive, state apparatus as necessary for the transition period (the "dictatorship of the proletariat"). Mises viewed government as a necessary institution for maintaining peace and the framework for social cooperation but insisted that freedom is found in the sphere where the government does not interfere. He was a vocal opponent of any government intervention, viewing "middle-of-the-road" policies as leading inevitably to full socialism. 

In summary, rather than a convergence, the relationship between Marx and Mises is defined by a deep and irreconcilable ideological and theoretical chasm, representing two diametrically opposed visions for society and the organization of economic life.

- GoogleAI 

https://www.google.com/search?q=Any+convergence+between+Marx+and+Mises

Marx and Ludwig von Mises have fundamentally opposing ethical and economic frameworks, and attempts to find common ground reveal their deep disagreements rather than a meeting of basic ethics. 

Fundamental Ethical Divergence

• Marxist Ethics (Class-based and Humanist): Marx's (and subsequent Marxists') ethics are generally viewed as arising from a critique of the exploitation and alienation inherent in capitalism, which treats human labor as a mere commodity. The core ethical imperative is the emancipation of the working class and the realization of full human potential (species-being) in a future classless, stateless society where individuals are treated as ends, not means. Morality is seen as historically and socially conditioned, ultimately aiming for a universal human thriving beyond class interests.
• Misesian Ethics (Individualist and Utilitarian): Mises was a staunch advocate of classical liberalism, rooting his ethics in individual liberty, private property, and free markets. His framework is often interpreted through a utilitarian lens, arguing that the market economy, based on voluntary exchange and the price system, is the only way to achieve rational economic calculation, coordinate human action, and ultimately lead to the greatest peace and prosperity for all individuals. He viewed the harmony of interests within capitalism as morally superior to the inherent conflict of class struggle. 

No Common Ground

The two thinkers do not meet at a "basic ethics" because their foundational views of human nature, society, and the role of the economy are diametrically opposed: 

• The Role of the State: Marx envisioned a future stateless society after a transitional phase of collective ownership. Mises advocated for a limited state whose sole purpose is to protect private property and enforce contracts, enabling the free market to function.
• Conception of Value: Marx's economics relied on the labor theory of value, which posits that labor is the source of all value and surplus value is exploitation. Mises adhered to the subjective theory of value, arguing that value is an expression of individual preferences and choices, making the market the only mechanism to determine rational prices and allocate resources.
• View of Social Order: Marx saw capitalism as a system of inherent class antagonism leading to conflict and crisis. Mises saw the free market as a cooperative system based on the division of labor, where the interests of all participants are harmonized through voluntary exchange. 

In essence, what one considered a moral abomination (exploitation of labor, alienation) the other considered an unfortunate mischaracterization of a system that provided the only path to a moral (prosperous and free) society. Their ethical foundations are a source of intense ideological conflict, not consensus.

- GoogleAI

https://www.google.com/search?q=Marx+and+Mises%3A+they+must+be+meeting+at+some+basic+ethics

Individual is above all institutions

 Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra

M.N. Roy's Radical Humanism prioritizes individual freedom, reason, and a scientific mindset, viewing the individual as the ultimate source of authority and a departure from Marxism. In contrast, Deendayal Upadhyaya's Integral Humanism emphasizes the holistic integration of the individual with society, the universe, and spiritual values, advocating for a decentralized society rooted in India's cultural heritage and rejecting Western-centric ideologies like pure individualism or socialism. Both philosophies reject materialism and dogmatism but differ significantly in their approach to individualism versus community and the role of tradition. 

M.N. Roy's Radical Humanism

• Core principles: Prioritizes individual liberty, freedom, and rationalism. It is considered a "philosophy of freedom" that emphasizes reason and scientific thinking.
• Individualism: Places the individual above all institutions, including the state and society.
• Rejection of dogma: Critiques and rejects dogmatic ideologies like traditional Marxism and authoritarianism.
• Approach: Advocates for a secular, democratic society based on human rights, equality, and justice, with decisions guided by reason and evidence. 

Deendayal Upadhyaya's Integral Humanism

• Core principles: Proposes a holistic view of human existence, integrating the physical, intellectual, and spiritual aspects of the individual within their environment.
• Community and spirituality: Believes in the interdependence of the individual and society, and that a nation's identity is rooted in its cultural and spiritual heritage ("Chiti").
• Rejection of Western models: Critiques modern Western concepts like pure individualism, socialism, and capitalism, which it believes do not fit India's unique context.
• Approach: Advocates for a decentralized political and economic model with the village at its base and a national identity rooted in its own culture, not imported ideologies. 

Key differences

Feature	Radical Humanism (M.N. Roy)	Integral Humanism (Deendayal Upadhyaya)
Focus	Primacy of the individual	Holistic integration of the individual, society, and universe
Source of values	Reason, science, and individual ethics	Cultural and spiritual heritage, balanced material and spiritual existence
Relationship with tradition	Rejection of dogma and tradition	Integration of traditional cultural and spiritual values
Approach to society	Secular, democratic, and based on individual rights	Decentralized, with the village as the basic unit, and rooted in national "Chiti"

- GoogleAI 

https://www.google.com/search?q=mn+roy%27s+radical+humanism+and.+deendayal+upadhyaya%27s+integral+humanism&sca_esv

Gandhi and Sri Aurobindo enacted these values through their life projects

 Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra

The "menace of Hindutva" refers to the serious concerns and intense criticisms directed at the ethno-nationalist political ideology that aims to establish India as a Hindu-only state (or "Hindu Rashtra"), which critics argue threatens India's secular democracy, pluralistic society, and the rights of its minority populations. 

Key concerns and criticisms associated with Hindutva include:

• Marginalization of Minorities: Critics argue that Hindutva promotes Hindu supremacy, leading to the public demonization, social marginalization, and an increase in violence (including mob lynchings and hate speech) against religious minorities, particularly Muslims and Christians.
• Threat to Secularism and Democracy: Hindutva is described as a far-right, anti-pluralistic ideology that seeks to replace India's secular foundations with a monolithic, majoritarian state. Critics contend that this movement has contributed to the decline of Indian democracy, leading to an "electoral autocracy".
• Links to Fascism: Scholars and activists have drawn parallels between Hindutva and European fascism, pointing to its origins in early 20th-century European nationalist ideas, the paramilitary nature of its core organization (the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, or RSS), the use of a "cult of personality" around leaders like Narendra Modi, and the targeting of a "them" group to create an "us" identity.
• Rewriting History and Undermining Academia: Adherents are accused of falsifying history, promoting an "imagined" past of Hindu glory to justify present-day political goals, and attacking academic freedom. Academics and journalists critical of the ideology face harassment, threats, and censorship.
• Caste Dynamics: Some critics argue that Hindutva is a contemporary form of Brahminism that seeks to restore an upper-caste social order, thereby perpetuating and reinforcing caste-based discrimination.
• Normalizing Violence and Intolerance: The ideology is criticized for creating an atmosphere where intolerance and violence against dissenters and minorities are normalized. The use of certain chants ("Jai Shri Ram") has become associated with Hindu nationalist violence in India and even in the diaspora. 

Proponents of Hindutva, however, view it as a form of cultural nationalism aimed at cherishing Hindu traditions and protecting the country's culture from perceived external threats. They often reject accusations of fascism or anti-minority bias, framing their actions as a self-assertion of the majority community after centuries of foreign rule. Many mainstream Hindus also distance themselves from the ideology, stating it does not represent the inclusive nature of Hinduism as a religion. 

- GoogleAI

Justice as wholeness: An Indic framework for inclusion and flourishing

P Kaipa, J Storberg-Walker - Encyclopedia of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and …, 2025

… Having explored the metaphysical and experiential grounding of these four principles, we now turn to two powerful exemplars— Gandhi and Sri Aurobindo—who enacted these values through their life projects. Their journeys offer us contrasting yet …

Transversal Unionism: Resisting and Navigating a Neoliberal City Through Identity and Labour Power

D Dhar, AA Thuppilikkat, S Bhattacharya - Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy: The …, 2025

… Organizing lower-class migrant workers’ in such scenarios also opens up new frontiers of political resistance, demonstrating the interconnectedness of struggles against Hindutva in multiple provinces, as seen in our case. Therefore, organising …

[PDF] Realizing the modernization and globalization of social science objectives: Why the battle and the fight must begin immediately and how to do it

SR Mandavilli - 2025

… obsolescence and “degradation” at the hands of Steve Farmer, “You are on a quixotic half-Hindutva and half-anti-Hindutva quest”; this allegation is of course only absurd, but it shows us, and demonstrates to us that we still have a very long way to …

[PDF] REVISITING THE PAST: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF MASS MEDIA IN THE POPULARIZATION OF ANCIENT INDIAN CIVILIZATIONS

JM Digambar, D Hajare, S Shinde, MH Shinge…

The present research critically examines the central role of mass media in constructing public knowledge and popularizing ancient Indian cultures, ie, Indus Valley (Harappan), Vedic, and Mauryan periods. Using a qualitative approach, the …

Re (creating) Honour and History: Dalit Veeranganas in Mohandas Naimisharay's Veerangana Jhalkari Bai and Mata Prasad's Veerangana Uda Devi Pasi

P Maurya - Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 2025

… Contemporary India sees the promulgation of the idea of conflating Hindutva and Indian nationalism by various groups. This exercise of power, identity and patriotism resonates with the abuse, authority, discrimination, oppression and exploitation of …

[PDF] Disinterring 100 new scientific fallacies direct and indirect: Using discourse and narrative analyses to unearth new scientific fallacies

SR Mandavilli - 2025

… , though they have been canonically against Hindutva groups. Likewise, Marxist historians have been in cahoots not only with colonial Indologists, but with Dravidian nationalists and Dalit leaders as well, though they have been opposed to Hindutva …

All-inclusive social welfarism of a Hindu Dalit Refugee identity in Bengal's Orakandi replacing politics for empowerment: exploring the scope of a new Dalit assertion

P Mallick - Social Identities, 2025

… It has been furthered by the emergence of the Hindutva approach of the BJP. The same kind of division also exists in the Thakurbari. … east Bengal’ because of the emergence of BJP’s politics of Hindutva being applied to the Matuas because had …

[PDF] THEORY AND PRACTICE IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

W Ettmayer

… In a book published in 1923, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar coined the term "Hindutva", whereby his aim was to unite all Hindus under the same nationalist banner. Savarkar initially came into conflict with the law … This party has included "Hindutva" …

[HTML] Queer-Religious Symbol Analysis (QRSA): A Semiotic Method for Reframing Hindu Iconography

PS AC, C GK - MethodsX, 2025

As sacred traditions face renewed scrutiny, there's a pressing need for methods that read religious iconography as fluid, resistant, and open to new meanings. This article presents the Queer-Religious Symbol Analysis (QRSA) method, a visual-semiotic …