Friday, March 04, 2016

Establish institutions of eminence where classical Indian spiritual traditions are taught

Previous Part

Opposing The Left Is Not “Right”: Part II: More To Mahishasura

Asura or the negative hostile forces operates through both: ignorance and evil. And that is why you will almost always find left-wing supporting the causes of these undivine forces engaged in the process of fragmentation and division—it almost always happens in the name of ideals. And it is behind these high ideals that it avoids the scrutiny of an incisive intellect. Therefore what I am suggesting here:
1. The State at this point in time should act tough and go after these outright evil students, activists, academics, and intellectuals who have any connection with the violent groups—whether it is Naxals, Maoists, or Jihadists.
2. For the others, the ignorant ones, it should ensure that they are unharmed and should be allowed their academic freedom and freedom of expression. Clamping down on them or on JNU or any other academic institution is not the solution. But the State should ensure that there are institutions that explore the traditional Indian thought that can challenge the left-wing thinking in the spirit of academic freedom and debate. The State should ensure that it does not harm the non-violent left intellectuals but it should also ensure that these left-wing intellectuals shun their academic fascism by allowing voices that challenge them in an academic setting—there is a strong need of creating institutions of eminence which teach social sciences through prisms other than those of the left-wing.
For far too long, the left-wing intellectuals have enjoyed the patronage of State for promoting the Nehruvian-Marxian-left ideology and clamping down on anyone who differs from them by right away putting them in the extreme Hindu camp. Then they link the budding intellectuals with Nero or fascists or Gujrat violence, and that is where the story ends. There is always the support of most English media, and they happily and gleefully go back home celebrating their unknown fascism, having killed dissent and difference of opinion. The classical Indian traditions have a long history of very sophisticated intellectual arguments, which have been almost totally killed by the left-wing fascists in India. This is what the left-wing does to dissent and difference of opinion coming from the classical Indian traditions, necessarily in the same order: Hindu, Brahmanical, RSS-BJP, Gandhi Killers, Gujarat violence, Nero, fascists, Nazis.
So my dear fellow Indians, if you think that you have won the freedom of expression vs nationalism debate, let me tell you point blank: YOU HAVE YET AGAIN BEEN FOOLED BY THE ASURA. This asura is much devious than you can gather. It knows that it has lost the debate of freedom of expression vs nationalism debate.
So, now it will lie low for some time. It will look for some scuffle here and there so that it can link it up with extremism and fascism. In fact, it has already begun demonizing your nationalism by linking it with fascism and Nazism. This “mayavi” asura, operating through evil and ignorance, will demonize everything spiritual that you may be wanting to do.
The demon is hiding in the left-wing thinking, working through outright evil and fooling the ignorant. And because there are many nice hearted ignorant people in the grip and clutch of the asura, the best approach for the governance should be to create academic institutions of eminence where the nice-hearted, well-meaning left intellectuals can be engaged through an academic spirit of inquiry and shown a different light where they can transcend and integrate their idealism and desire to create a beautiful world for something larger and better.

Analyzing the above

Any individual who is not ideologically blind will see that the above two pieces are transcending the binary of freedom of expression vs. nationalism, in which the debate of TV channels got bifurcated. I have explicitly stated that the “significance of all this is much deeper, which unfortunately will get lost in the freedom of expression vs. nationalism debate, not that the debate is not necessary.” So on one hand I say that the deeper significance of this issue will get lost in the freedom of expression vs. nationalism debate but on the other hand, I also say that the debate is necessary.
I specifically favor nationalism when I make a call to the State to investigate and persecute these left ideologues, who have explicit connection with violent groups. On the other hand, I strongly tilt towards freedom of expression when I clearly state that the State should ensure that the good-hearted and good-spirited left intellectuals are not harmed in any which way and that it should ensure that their freedom of expression and academic freedom does not come under any cloud. I make it a point to emphasize that clamping down on JNU is not the solution.
On the contrary, the State should take measures to establish institutions of eminence where classical Indian spiritual traditions are taught. I am not in any way or form for reducing the plurality or diversity in ways of knowledge pursuit. On the contrary, I am all for promoting and proliferating it. I am certainly against is is the fascism of the Indian left, which begins to tarnish dissent always by linking it with extreme Hindu right. This is a dangerous trend in India, and it is important that the academics in India should know about and raise their voice against.
I do not understand if this is not liberal thinking, then what is!
[The two posts led to a vigorous debate between Prof. Kundan and a Facebook friend who is a mainstream journalist in India.  This will be the 3rd part of these series.]
Spirituality that Bharat represents Savitri Era Party ‏@SavitriEraParty
Vision of Sri Aurobindo where the utopia of the left is preserved Kundan Singh Author of “The Evolution of Integral Yoga: Sri Aurobindo, Sri Ramakrishna, and Swami Vivekananda,” and several other edited-book chapters like ...
Author of “The Evolution of Integral Yoga: Sri Aurobindo, Sri Ramakrishna, and Swami Vivekananda,” and several other edited-book chapters like “Beyond Mind: The Future of Psychology as Science” “Beyond Postmodernism: Towards a Future Psychology,” “Relativism, Self-Referentiality, and Beyond Mind,” and “Relativism and Its Relevance for Psychology.” Kundan Singh, PhD is an academic who teaches and lectures in the San Francisco Bay Area. He is a graduate of the California Institute of Integral Studies and University of Delhi.

No comments:

Post a Comment