Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra
Stay away from communist leaders like Marx, Mao, and Che Guevara, and also Bhagat Singh, Malcolm X, and similar. Phule, Shahu, Periyar, and Ambedkar were greater revolutionaries than them. Communists are failed people. China turned to capitalism, and there is no communist country worth recognition.
https://twitter.com/nitinmeshram_/status/1735283569474646304?t=kZnTB9-5v-wObKDOXkfRoQ&s=19
I always ask this question and never get a satisfactory answer hence asking again, who was the equivalent of phule periyar ambedkar from cow respecting hindi speaking belt. If not then why ?
https://twitter.com/AndColorPockeT/status/1735562684173848947?t=QQnQUBorAIfA7AYBtsdxDw&s=19
I can offer some a sociopolitical hypothesis (to be proved or falsified with help of recorded or assumed history):
1. Political: In order to have the kind of toxic ideology rooted in hatred for Brahmins (and Rajputs), you need to have folks exclusively from these castes in positions that are either detested or coveted e.g. zamindars, tax collectors, etc. In North, I think presence of Muslims in elite classes (not all Muslims of course) neutralized that effect to an extent.
2. Social: Due to multiple invasions and wars, social structure in the north went through metamorphosis and possibly caste as a system didn’t have the same kind of influence and rigidity as in other places. Furthermore, influences ranging from Sant Ravidas centuries ago to as recent as Neem Karori Baba mainstreamed a belief that hierarchal/rigid caste system was not intrinsic to Hindu faith and thus anti-caste did not necessarily translate to anti-Hinduism.
There has to be a socioeconomic hypothesis too, that experts on X can offer. On my part, I think in the ‘cow belt’ where ‘cow economics’ would be followed, the relationship between various castes was far more symbiotic than in places were economics was totally inverted or newly introduced by the British.
https://twitter.com/rahulroushan/status/1735577160545399254?t=0NS1r4LnM_S7qiez22_TFg&s=19
Hegemony? I said presence. And Muslims were indeed present as nawabs, zamindars, etc. during British rule too, and that's what I pointed out.
https://twitter.com/rahulroushan/status/1735592253484114131?t=IXk-5DRJ8YULaFMQzZEEZg&s=19
Here is my conjecture
1. May be Periyar/Phule/Ambedkar succeeded because land owning dominant castes were polarized against Brahmins
This didnt happen in North.
2. In Deccan, prior to british
Dominant castes were at top of social status
Brahmins were dependent on them
After British
Dominant caste lost their status
And Brahmins with government jobs became prominent
3. This didnt happen in North
Because in North due to Islamic rule, dominant castes had already lost their prominent status
Against Muslims, Hindus were united
https://twitter.com/doubtinggaurav/status/1735596741448056834?t=hdm6lFBxsLhJVtWRTLmSLA&s=19
For adolescent females, the Court suggested following duties
For adolescent males, the Court suggested following duties
The Court also pointed towards the need for fostering a conducive atmosphere at home where children grow up with parents playing a central role in ensuring this, reported Bar and Bench.
Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar has been accused of using derogatory language in the Assembly on Tuesday as he was explaining the role of education among women for population control. The video of Nitish Kumar explaining his point on population control went viral on social media and several Bihar women MLAs objected to the language used by the chief minister.
सीएम नीतीश ने कहा कि बिहार में महिलाएं पहले से ज्यादा साक्षर हैं. बिहार के मुख्यमंत्री ने कहा कि लड़कियों के पढ़ने-लिखने से जनसंख्या नियंत्रित रहेगी. अपनी बात को समझाने के लिए उन्होंने कहा, 'लड़की पढ़ लेगी अगर, तो जब शादी होगा. तब पुरुष रोज रात में करता है न. उसी में और (बच्चे) पैदा हो जाता है. लड़की अगर पढ़ लेगी तो उसको भीतर मत ..., उसको .... कर दो. इसी में संख्या घट रही है.'
No comments:
Post a Comment